MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131517253 · doi:10.1002/cne.20927

Neuropeptide FF distribution in the human and rat forebrain: A comparative immunohistochemical study

2006· article· en· W2131517253 on OpenAlexaff
Valeri D. Goncharuk, Ruud M. Buijs, David MacTavish, Jack H. Jhamandas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesAnimal Welfare Institute
KeywordsForebrainStria terminalisFornixBiologyHypothalamusNeuropeptideSupraoptic nucleusNucleusNeuroscienceHuman brainCell biologyHippocampusCentral nervous systemReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) is an octapeptide implicated in a variety of physiological functions, including nociception, cardiovascular responses, and neuroendocrine regulation. The NPFF gene and its mRNA are highly conserved across species. A comparative study of NPFF distribution in the human and rat forebrain was carried out by using single NPFF and double NPFF + vasopressin (VP) immunohistochemistry. NPFF is extensively localized within neurochemical circuits of human and rat forebrain. Semiquantitative analysis revealed that the densities of NPFF cells and fibers in many forebrain nuclei in the human correlate well with those observed for the same structures in the rat. High numbers of NPFF positive neurons in the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus and a dense plexus of NPFF fibers surrounding the fornix within the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis were identified in the human and rat forebrain. Within the hypothalamus of both species, dense NPFF innervation was observed in the perinuclear zone of the supraoptic nucleus (SO) just dorsolateral to the VP-positive neurons. Extensive NPFF innervation of ventricular ependyma and brain microvasculature were common for both species. At the same time, obvious differences in NPFF localization between the two species were also apparent. For example, in contrast to the rat SO, no NPFF- or NPFF- + VP-immunostained cells were observed in the human SO. Knowledge of NPFF neuroanatomical localization in the human brain and the relationship of these observations to those in the rat brain may provide insight into the role of this peptide in central cardiovascular and neuroendocrine regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFrench-language works237,207