MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131554287 · doi:10.1142/s1793292014500398

FABRICATING WELL-DISPERSED NANOSIZED GOLD CATALYST ON TITANATE NANOWIRES SURFACE FOR 4-NITROPHENOL REDUCTION

2014· article· en· W2131554287 on OpenAlexaff
Guangliang Chen, Fei Xue, Zhili Chen, Xiaolei Si, Xu Zheng, Jun Huang, Sylvain Massey

Bibliographic record

VenueNANO · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicNanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCatalysis4-NitrophenolChemical engineeringNanowireColloidal goldHydrothermal circulationPrecipitationSelective catalytic reductionNanotechnologyTitanateNanoparticleSubstrate (aquarium)Composite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, homogenous gold nanoparticles ( AuNPs ) with a high density and a narrow size distribution were successfully fabricated on titanate nanowires (TNWs) scaffolds in the absence of organic capping agents. An ameliorated low-temperature hydrothermal method was used to prepare the TNWs scaffolds like bird's nest on the Ti substrate, and the nanowires diameter was about 30–80nm. Then, AuNPs were synthesized on the TNWs scaffolds with a deposition–precipitation urea (DPU) method. The TEM and XRD measurements indicated that well-crystallized face-centered cubic (fcc) AuNPs were homogeneously dispersed on TNWs, and AuNPs with average sizes of 2.7 nm and 4 nm were obtained, respectively for the theoretical gold loading 5 wt.% and 8 wt.%. Inspiringly, the 8%- AuNPs /TNWs catalyst could reduce 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) to 4-aminophenol (4-AP) within 210 s, and exhibited better catalytic reduction performance than that of 5%- AuNPs /TNWs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNANOSame topicNanomaterials for catalytic reactionsFrench-language works237,207