Virus loads in Douglas-fir tussock moth larvae infected with the <i>Orgyia pseudotsugata</i> nucleopolyhedrovirus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We studied Orgyia pseudotsugata multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (OpMNPV) infections in larvae of the Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata McDunnough (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), to determine the quantity of OpMNPV particles that result in mortality. We observed a bimodal pattern of mortality in Douglas-fir tussock moth larvae that ingested diet plugs contaminated with 9.5 OpMNPV occlusion bodies. A mortality peak (80% of total mortality observed) occurred between day 5 and day 11 post ingestion, and a second, smaller mortality peak coincided with the onset of pupation. Virus loads, defined as the number of OpMNPV occlusion bodies in each sample of tested larval homogenate, were quantified using an indirect ELISA method. Virus loads that resulted in mortality were significantly greater than those quantified in larvae that were sacrificed during and after the peak mortality wave (P < 0.004 and P < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney U two-tailed rank test and SPSS®, respectively). This is the first known attempt to differentiate the quantity of virus produced during lethal infections from the virus loads in larvae that survive infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".