MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131579831 · doi:10.1586/14737140.2013.816461

Rational cotargeting of Pim-1 and Akt in prostate cancer

2013· letter· en· W2131579831 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Toren, Amina Zoubeidi

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Anticancer Therapy · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Mechanisms and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein kinase BPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayReceptor tyrosine kinaseMedicineCancer researchTyrosine kinaseProstate cancerKinaseMediatorSignal transductionCancerPharmacologyReceptorInternal medicineBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paul Torena & Amina Zoubeidi*ba The Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canadab The Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. * Author for correspondenceEvaluation of: Cen B, Mahajan S, Wang W, Kraft AS. Elevation of receptor tyrosine kinases by small molecule AKT inhibitors in prostate cancer is mediated by Pim-1. Cancer Res. 73(11), 3402–3411 (2013).The PI3K/Akt pathway is a key pathway in many advanced and aggressive cancers. Targeted inhibition of this pathway is currently an actively pursued therapeutic strategy. However, blockade of this pathway with inhibitors has been challenging, with up-regulation of reciprocal feedback pathways contributing to treatment failures. The article evaluated presents mechanistic data on how Pim is a critical mediator of the receptor tyrosine elevation induced by Akt inhibition. Pim-1 kinases are overexpressed in resistant and aggressive cancers. Following Akt inhibition, Pim- regulates receptor tyrosine kinases up-regulation, at least in part, through a cap-independent translation. This research leads the way for further evaluation of co-targeting strategies using Pim-1 inhibitors in combination with PI3K/Akt pathway inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Anticancer TherapySame topicCancer Mechanisms and TherapyFrench-language works237,207