Solvolysis and ring closure of quinone methides photogenerated from biaryl systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A variety of biaryl quinone methides have been photogenerated with a range of efficiencies from biaryl precursors 46 and 8, 10, and 11, all having hydroxyl and hydroxymethyl substituents on alternate rings. These novel biaryl quinone methides, which cannot be readily generated via thermal chemistry, are trapped by added nucleophiles such as MeOH and ethanolamine; two that cannot undergo electrocyclic ring closure (from 8 and 11) are readily observable by nanosecond laser photolysis, with long wavelength maxima (λmax) of 600 and 520 nm, respectively. Photogenerated o,o′-biaryl quinone methides undergo electrocyclic ring closure to give the corresponding chromene (pyran) products in high yield. Since the precursor biaryl alcohols have highly twisted structures in the ground state (dihedral angle of up to 90° by molecular mechanics calculations), a significant twisting motion to planarity is required to achieve reaction. Using steady-state fluorescence studies, we present evidence to suggest that the mechanism of quinone methide formation may occur via one of the following mechanisms: (i) dissociation of the proton from ArOH that precedes twisting; or (ii) ArOH dissociation and twisting taking place either simultaneously or in quick succession.Key words: biaryl quinone methide, photosolvolysis, photodeprotonation, photocyclization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".