MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131611002 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5817

Sequential Transcription Factor Targeting for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas

2008· article· en· W2131611002 on OpenAlexaff
Leandro Cerchietti, José M. Polo, Gustavo Felippe da Silva, Pedro Farinha, Rita Shaknovich, Randy D. Gascoyne, Steven F. Dowdy, Ari Melnick

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsBCL6Cancer researchTranscription factorBiologyRepressorLymphomaPsychological repressionDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaSuppressorGeneB cellGene expressionImmunologyGeneticsGerminal center

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcription factors play a central role in malignant transformation by activating or repressing waves of downstream target genes. Therapeutic targeting of transcription factors can reprogram cancer cells to lose their advantages in growth and survival. The BCL6 transcriptional repressor plays a central role in the pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and controls downstream checkpoints, including the p53 tumor suppressor gene. We report that a specific inhibitor of BCL6 called BPI can trigger a p53 response in DLBCL cells. This was partially due to induction of p53 activity and partially due to relief of direct repression by BCL6 of p53 target genes. BPI could thus induce a p53-like response even in the presence of mutant p53. Moreover, sequential BCL6 peptide inhibitors followed by p53 peptide or small-molecule activators provided a more powerful antilymphoma effect than either treatment alone by maximally restoring p53 target gene expression. Therefore, tandem targeting of the overlapping BCL6 and p53 transcriptional programs can correct aberrant survival pathways in DLBCL and might provide an effective therapeutic approach to lymphoma therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207