SPAM1 Isoforms from Two Tissue Origins Are Differentially Localized Within Ejaculated Bull Sperm Membranes and Have Different Roles During Fertilization1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deduced amino acid sequence of bull sperm, SPAM1, suggests that it possesses a transmembrane domain between the hyaluronidase and the putative zona pellucida (ZP) binding domains. The objective of this study was to determine the orientation and localization of SPAM1 in order to understand how it could fulfill these two roles. We report that two isoforms of SPAM1 are present on ejaculated bull spermatozoa: one localized on the anterior portion of the sperm head, and the other on the postacrosomal portion of the head. The first isoform is expressed intracellularly, while the second one is detected at the sperm surface with its hyaluronidase domain facing the extracellular environment. Two-dimensional electrophoresis revealed that the two isoforms have different masses (80 and 70 kDa, respectively), and LC/MS/MS analyses confirmed our previously published deduced amino acid sequence of bovine SPAM1. In addition, this approach showed that the 70-kDa isoform differs from the 80-kDa isoform in its C terminus. Our results suggest that the shorter SPAM1 form originates from the epididymis, while the longer one is produced during spermatogenesis. These results clearly demonstrate that ejaculated bull sperm possess two forms of SPAM1: one (epididymal) expressed at the surface, and one (testicular) that interacts with the ZP after the acrosome exocytosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".