MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131613319 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2015.7321983

An intelligent SDN framework for 5G heterogeneous networks

2015· article· en· W2131613319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHeterogeneous networkSoftware-defined networkingScalabilityDistributed computingComputer networkVariety (cybernetics)Resource allocationResource management (computing)Wireless networkWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In fifth-generation (5G) mobile networks, a major challenge is to effectively improve system capacity and meet dynamic service demands. One promising technology to solve this problem is heterogeneous networks (HetNets), which involve a large number of densified low power nodes (LPNs). This article proposes a software defined network (SDN) based intelligent model that can efficiently manage the heterogeneous infrastructure and resources. In particular, we first review the latest SDN standards and discuss the possible extensions. We then discuss the advantages of SDN in meeting the dynamic nature of services and requirements in 5G HetNets. Finally, we develop a variety of schemes to improve traffic control, subscriber management, and resource allocation. Performance analysis shows that our proposed system is reliable, scalable, and implementable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it