Ellipsometry as a probe of crystallization kinetics in thin diblock copolymer films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present results on the use of ellipsometry as a novel probe for the crystallization kinetics in thin films of a diblock copolymer. Ellipsometry makes use of the change in polarization induced upon the reflection of light from a film‐covered substrate to enable the calculation of the refractive index and thickness of the film. The information obtained with these measurements can be compared with information from differential scanning calorimetry, with the additional advantages that small sample volumes and slow cooling rates can be employed and that expansion coefficients can be determined. By studying the temperature dependence of these quantities, we are able to measure the crystallization kinetics within very small volumes (∼10 −10 L) of a poly(butadiene‐ b ‐ethylene oxide) diblock copolymer. Through a comparison of two different poly (ethylene oxide) block lengths, we demonstrate a reduction in both the crystallization and melting temperatures as the domain volume is reduced. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 3448–3452, 2006
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".