Multilevel amplitude shift keying in dispersion uncompensated optical systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors model and characterise the performance of 10 Gbit/s 4-ary amplitude shift keying (ASK) systems in dispersive environments at 1550 nm. Both non-return-to-zero (NRZ) and return-to-zero (RZ) formats are examined, with comparisons to on-off keying (OOK) in each case. Both single amplified links and cascaded fibre-amplifier links are modelled. While 4-ary ASK systems suffer a back-to-back sensitivity penalty of up to 7 dB with respect to OOK, they offer a significantly reduced dispersion sensitivity, particularly for RZ formats. This suggests advantages for M-ary coding in future systems employing optical time division multiplexing. Optimal level spacing for ASK is analysed and approximations for different noise regimes are shown to fit well to detailed calculations. Sensitivity to extinction ratio is examined; RZ systems are shown to have higher sensitivity than NRZ for both 4-ary and OOK. Finally, the authors show that frequency drift, or equivalently, a de-tuning in the centre frequency of the optical filter, is more severe for OOK than for 4-ary ASK, especially in the case of non-fully dispersion uncompensated systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it