MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131657772 · doi:10.1093/europace/eun032

A novel pacing manoeuvre to diagnose atrial tachycardia

2008· article· en· W2131657772 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Sarkozy, Sergio Richter, Gian‐Battista Chierchia, Carlo de Asmundis, Christos Seferlis, P. Brugada, L. Kaufman, Ronald Buyl, Paul Dorian, Iqwal Mangat

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineSupraventricular tachycardiaCoronary sinusAtrial tachycardiaTachycardiaAtrium (architecture)Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardiaPredictive valueCardiac pacingElectrophysiology studyElectrophysiologyAnesthesiaAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Currently used diagnostic manoeuvres at the electrophysiology study do not always allow for consistent identification of atrial tachycardia (AT), either because of inapplicability of the technique or because of low predictive value and specificity. The aim of this study was to determine whether overdrive atrial pacing during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with the same cycle length from both the high right atrium and the coronary sinus can accurately identify or exclude AT by examining the difference between the V-A intervals of the first returning beat of tachycardia between the two pacing sites. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included; 24 patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT), 13 patients with atrioventricular re-entry tachycardia (AVRT), and 15 patients with AT. Comparing the 37 non-AT patients with the 15 AT patients, there was a highly significant difference between the mean V-A interval difference, (delta V-A) 2.1 +/- 1.8 ms (range 0-9 ms) vs. 79.1 +/- 42 (range 22-267 ms) (P < 0.001), respectively. None of the patients in the non-AT group had a delta V-A > 10 ms. In contrast, all 15 patients with AT had a delta V-A interval >10 ms. Thus, the diagnostic accuracy of the delta V-A interval cut-off of >10 ms was 100%, with a 95% confidence interval of 93.1-100% for AT. In 11 (73%) of the 15 AT patients, the standard ventricular overdrive pacing manoeuvre was not possible. In 14 of the 15 patients (93%) in the AT group, standard atrial overdrive pacing showed variable V-A intervals, correctly diagnosing AT. In all 52 patients, this measurement was repeated during pacing from the other location. In five patients from the AT group, the result of the second attempt was different from the result of the first attempt. CONCLUSION: We found that atrial differential pacing during paroxysmal SVT without termination of tachycardia and the finding of variable returning V-A interval was highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of AT. The manoeuvre can be easily performed in all patients with SVT and is highly reproducible. It is a useful adjunct to the currently available ventricular and atrial pacing manoeuvres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207