Long-term Orientation, Perceived Consumer Effectiveness, and Environmentally Conscious Consumer Behavior: The Case of Turkey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes the impact of long-term orientation and perceived consumer effectiveness onenvironmentally/ecologically conscious consumer behavior in the context of Turkey. Turkey is a collectivist,high-context culture of significant geo-political importance with unique socio-cultural traits. The population isyoung and natural resources are rich. In Turkey, environmental consciousness is a relatively less internalizedconcept to which people are just recently beginning to adjust. All of this makes Turkey an interesting market tostudy the environmentally conscious consumer behavior (ECCB) construct. Looking at the impact of long-termorientation on ECCB is also one of the important contributions of this paper since environmental consciousnessrequires a long-term view of the world around us. Building upon the adaptation and extension of past research inthe area, data are collected from 97 respondents, 80 per cent of whom are undergraduate college students, andanalyzed through commonly used statistical methods. The measures used are similar to those used in previousstudies. Environmentally conscious consumer behavior measure is adapted from Roberts (1996b) and McCartyand Shrum (1994). Roberts’ (1996b) perceived consumer effectiveness measure is used in the study. Long-termorientation scale is adapted from Bearden, Money and Nevins (2006).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".