« L’évolution historique » et ses marges : éléments pour une lecture critique de Cinquante ans de modernité musicale de Deliège
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Célestin Deliège, en témoin de son temps, livre un monument, une source première, une histoire des grammaires où se croisent aussi esthétique et politique. Le concept central d’évolution historique se rapporte à la « recherche musicale », à la « recherche sur le code », aux « efforts de recherche de langage ». Écrire l’histoire revient alors à établir un « recensement de théories intentionnelles, prescriptives, et de poétiques nouvelles ». Les marges quant à elles évoquent la glose musicologique mais surtout les nombreux compositeurs placés en marge de cette évolution historique, de ce trajet fléché, de Darmstadt à l’Ircam. Cette dichotomie reflète donc celle que C. Deliège pose lui-même. L’article essaie de montrer qu’il existe une diversité plus grande de forces en présence dans la modernité musicale de la seconde moitié du siècle dernier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".