MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131763090 · doi:10.1080/02841860410014939

Outcome and toxicity of postoperative short course adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy following resection of adenocarcinoma of the rectum

2004· article· en· W2131763090 on OpenAlexaff
James D. Brierley, Neil M. D’Souza, Bernard Cummings, Jolie Ringash, J.-H. John Kim, Pamela Catton, Rebecca Wong, Malcolm J. Moore, Melania Pintilie, Carissa Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Oncologica · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineToxicityRectumSurgeryRadiation therapyAdenocarcinomaAdjuvantPathologicalRetrospective cohort studyChemotherapyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A retrospective review has been performed to assess the outcome and toxicity of post-operative adjuvant therapy of 25 Gy/5 fractions/1 week following resection of stage II and III rectal cancer. Forty patients were treated between August 1992 and May 1995. The ages ranged from 42 to 79 (median 63); 32 were male (80%). At last follow up 32 were alive with 0.9 to 11.3 years of follow-up (median 6.6 years). The 5-year actuarial survival was 76% (95% CI: 62-91%). The local relapse free rate was 73% (95% CI: 58-88). Seven patients experienced grade 3 or 4 early toxicity. Three patients had grade 2 or 3 late toxicity. Although treatment was well tolerated, the local relapse rate observed was high. In view of the changes in surgical and pathological techniques in the last decade, further studies are required to determine the merits or otherwise of postoperative Short Course Adjuvant Radiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OncologicaSame topicColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207