MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131773335 · doi:10.1109/icc.2013.6654791

Social profile-based multicast routing scheme for delay-tolerant networks

2013· article· en· W2131773335 on OpenAlexaff
Xia Deng, Le Chang, Jun Tao, Jianping Pan, Jianxin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkMulticastUnicastGeocastDistributed computingDelay-tolerant networkingFlooding (psychology)Protocol Independent MulticastWireless ad hoc networkRouting (electronic design automation)Node (physics)Source-specific multicastScheme (mathematics)Routing protocolDynamic Source RoutingWireless Routing ProtocolWirelessTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By leveraging node mobility and exploring a store-carry-and-forward paradigm, delay-tolerant networking enables and assists end-to-end message delivery in many scenarios, e.g., vehicular ad hoc networks and mobile social networks. Most existing work in the literature either focuses on the routing strategies for unicast, or history-based routing for multicast communications. In this paper, we discover the most important and independent social features from the Infocom 06 trace data, and propose a social profile-based multicast routing scheme. Our proposed scheme reduces the delivery cost greatly compared with flooding-based schemes and achieves a similar performance to the history-based schemes, without the cost of maintaining the contact history. The efficiency of the proposed scheme has been confirmed by trace-driven simulation, which also reflects the efficacy of exploring social features in delay-tolerant networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207