MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131808744 · doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31819e85c6

Effect of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (Prasterone) on libido and sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women

2009· article· en· W2131808744 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill UniversityCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecMontreal Heart InstituteCollège ShawiniganMontreal Clinical Research InstituteQ & T ResearchCanadian Women's Health NetworkTheratechnologies (Canada)Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrgasmDehydroepiandrosteroneLibidoSexual functionMenopausePlaceboSexual desireVaginaSexual dysfunctionInternal medicineVaginal atrophySexual arousalEndocrinologyDecreased LibidoPhysiologyGynecologyAndrogenHormoneSexual behaviorHuman sexualityClinical psychologySurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide evidence that the transformation of DHEA into both androgens and/or estrogens locally in cells of the three layers of the vagina (epithelium, lamina propria, and muscularis) would have effects of greater impact, including effects on sexual function, than only effects on superficial epithelial cells as achieved with estrogens. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial has evaluated the effect of daily local intravaginal application of Prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone; DHEA) for 12 weeks on the domains of sexual dysfunction, namely, desire/interest, arousal, orgasm, and pain at sexual activity, in 216 postmenopausal women with moderate to severe symptoms of vaginal atrophy. RESULTS: A time- and dose-dependent improvement of the four domains of sexual function was observed. At the 12-week time interval, the 1.0% DHEA dose led, compared with placebo, to 49% (P = 0.0061) and 23% (P = 0.0257) improvements of the desire domains in the Menopause Specific Quality of Life and Abbreviated Sex Function questionnaires, respectively. Compared with placebo, the Abbreviated Sex Function arousal/sensation domain was improved by 68% (P = 0.006), the arousal/lubrication domain by 39% (P = 0.0014), orgasm by 75% (P = 0.047), and dryness during intercourse by 57% (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: By a local action in the vagina, DHEA applied daily at doses at which serum steroids remain well within normal postmenopausal values exerts relatively potent beneficial effects on all four aspects of sexual dysfunction. Such data indicate that combined androgenic/estrogenic stimulation in the three layers of the vagina exerts important beneficial effects on sexual function in women without systemic action on the brain and other extravaginal tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it