MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131841616 · doi:10.1109/isap.2009.5352817

Simplified Fuzzy Logic Controller and Its Application as a Power System Stabilizer

2009· article· en· W2131841616 on OpenAlexaff
M. Ramirez-Gonzalez, O.P. Malik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy logicFuzzy control systemController (irrigation)Electric power systemComputer scienceControl systemPower (physics)MathematicsControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simplified fuzzy logic controller (SFLC) with a significantly reduced set of fuzzy rules, small number of tuning parameters and simple control algorithm and structure is presented. The SFLC is derived from a two-dimensional and symmetrical rule table commonly used in fuzzy control applications. In the phase-plane, the required control action magnitude is proportional to the distance from the state of the system to the switching line (defined by the desired zero consequence). Based on the SFLC, a simplified power system stabilizer (SFLPSS) is designed and applied to a single machine-infinite bus system. Simulation studies are carried out to show that the proposed SFLPSS, with a considerably reduced rule base, is able to provide the same response as a fuzzy controller with the original set of fuzzy rules. The results also show the effectiveness of the proposed PSS in damping power system oscillations, as compared to a conventional PSS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207