MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131847371 · doi:10.1109/infcom.2001.916617

On the sensitivity of Web proxy cache performance to workload characteristics

2002· article· en· W2131847371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanarie
KeywordsComputer scienceWorkloadCacheProxy (statistics)LocalityLocality of referenceCache algorithmsZipf's lawParallel computingPopularityCPU cacheOperating systemDatabaseStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the design and use of a synthetic Web proxy workload generator (ProWGen) to investigate the sensitivity of proxy cache replacement policies to selected Web workload characteristics. Trace-driven simulations with synthetic workloads from ProWGen show the relative sensitivity of three popular cache replacement algorithms-LRU, LFU-aging and GD-size-to Zipf slope, temporal locality, and correlation (if any) between file size and popularity, and the relative insensitivity of these algorithms to one-timers and heavy tail index. Performance differences between the three policies are also highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207