MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131858004 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.032001

First observation of a<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>Υ</mml:mi><mml:mn/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn/></mml:math>state

2004· article· lv· W2131858004 on OpenAlexaff
G. Bonvicini, D. Cinabro, M. Dubrovin, A. Bornheim, E. Lipeles, S. P. Pappas, A. Shapiro, A. J. Weinstein, R. A. Briere, G. P. Chen, T. Ferguson, G. Tatishvili, H. Vogel, M. E. Watkins, N. E. Adam, J. Alexander, K. Berkelman, V. Boisvert, D. G. Cassel, J. E. Duboscq, K. M. Ecklund, R. Ehrlich, R. S. Galik, L. Gibbons, B. Gittelman, S. W. Gray, D. L. Hartill, B. K. Heltsley, L. Hsu, C. D. Jones, J. Kandaswamy, D. L. Kreinick, В. Е. Кузнецов, A. Magerkurth, H. Mahlke-Krüger, T. O. Meyer, T. K. Pedlar, D. Peterson, J. Pivarski, D. Riley, J. L. Rosner, A. J. Sadoff, H. Schwarthoff, M. R. Shepherd, W. Sun, J. G. Thayer, D. Urner, T. Wilksen, M. Weinberger, S. B. Athar, P. Avery, L. Breva-Newell, V. Potlia, H. Stoeck, J. Yelton, B. I. Eisenstein, G. D. Gollin, I. Karliner, N. Lowrey, P. Naik, C. Sedlack, M. Selen, J. J. Thaler, J. S. Williams, K. W. Edwards, D. Besson, K. Y. Gao, D. T. Gong, Y. Kubota, S. Z. Li, R. Poling, A. W. Scott, A. Smith, C. J. Stepaniak, J. Urheim, Z. Metreveli, K. K. Seth, A. Tomaradze, P. Zweber, J. Ernst, K. Arms, E. A. Eckhart, K. K. Gan, C. Gwon, H. Severini, P. Skubic, D. M. Asner, S. Dytman, S. Mehrabyan, J. Mueller, S. Nam, V. Savinov, G. S. Huang, D. H. Miller, V. Pavlunin, B. Sanghi, E. I. Shibata, I. P. J. Shipsey, G. S. Adams, M. Chasse, J. P. Cummings, I. Danko, J. Napolitano, D. Cronin-Hennessy, C. S. Park, W. Park, J. B. Thayer, E. H. Thorndike, T. E. Coan, Y. S. Gao, F. Liu, R. Stroynowski, M. Artuso, C. Boulahouache, S. Blusk, J. Butt, E. Dambasuren, O. Dorjkhaidav, J. Haynes, N. Menaa, R. Mountain, H. Muramatsu, R. Nandakumar, R. Redjimi, R. Sia, T. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, J. C. Wang, A. H. Mahmood, S. E. Csorna

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2004
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsBranching fractionProduction (economics)AnnihilationProduct (mathematics)Particle physicsHadronCrystallographyChemistryMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first evidence for the production of $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1D)$ states in the four-photon cascade, $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(3S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{b}(2P),$ ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{b}(2P)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1D),$ $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1D)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{b}(1P),$ ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{b}(1P)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1S),$ followed by the $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1S)$ annihilation into ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ or ${\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\ensuremath{-}}.$ The signal has a significance of 10.2 standard deviations. The measured product branching ratio for these five decays, $(2.5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.5)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5},$ is consistent with the theoretical estimates. The data are dominated by the production of one $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1D)$ state consistent with the $J=2$ assignment. Its mass is determined to be $(10161.1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.6)$ MeV, which is consistent with the predictions from potential models and lattice QCD calculations. We also searched for $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(3S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{b}(2P),$ ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{b}(2P)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1D),$ followed by either $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1D)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\eta}\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1S)$ or $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1D)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1S).$ We find no evidence for such decays and set upper limits on the product branching ratios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207