Poly lactic acid nanocomposites containing modified nanoclay with synergistic barrier to water vapor for coated paper
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The binary nanocomposites of poly lactic acid (PLA) with the montmorillonite modified with trisilanol polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (Trisilanolisooctyl POSS ® ) were prepared via a solution‐blending process and coated on paper by bar coating and compress hot melt coating methods. The resulting components were characterized with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X‐ray diffraction (XRD) techniques. Moreover, the water vapor transmission rates (WVTR) for the coated writing paper were determined using an IGA‐003. The results indicated that the modified clay PLA nanocomposites enhanced the water vapor barrier properties of coated paper significantly. The permeability of PLA nanocomposites to water vapor decreased by 74% [26.0 g/(m 2 day)], respectively, as compared to those of the paper coated with pure PLA. The dispersion and phase behavior of the modified montmorillonite in PLA matrix was revealed by Transmission electron microscope. The intercalation of montmorillonite with PLA was further demonstrated using XRD. WVTR results indicated that the compress hot melt coating of the nanocomposites is an effective method to improve the water vapor resistance of coated paper. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131 , 40952.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it