MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131887654 · doi:10.1109/intlec.2000.884314

Compatibility of switchmode rectifiers with engine generators

2002· article· en· W2131887654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsTD Bank Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower factorTransformerMains electricityAC powerEngineeringElectrical engineeringElectric power systemComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringPower (physics)Voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The factors that affect the compatibility of engine generators with switchmode rectifiers are identified. The performance of the input sections of active power factor corrected (PFC) rectifiers, that affect compatibility, are examined including turn on characteristics, input impedance and control loop stability. Recommendations are given for the characteristics of generators to assure stability. An overview of experiments conducted on three different 3-phase rectifier systems operated with both AC mains and engine generator sources is given. Typical power system designs to address rectifier input harmonic distortions reflected to the source (AC mains or standby generator) are reviewed. The cost savings and reliability of the AC power systems using conventional transformers in lieu of mitigation transformers, when well designed active power factor corrected (PFC) rectifiers are used, are presented for power systems backed up by standby generators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.141
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207