DIHYDROTESTOSTERONE AND THE PROSTATE: THE SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE FOR 5α-REDUCTASE INHIBITORS IN THE TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We reviewed the physiological and pathogenic role of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), evidence for the beneficial effects of decreasing DHT through 5alpha-reductase inhibition and the effects of altering the androgen balance with these agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the relevant literature was done using published studies identified from the MEDLINE database. RESULTS: The androgens DHT and testosterone have complementary roles in male physiology. Each is mediated through the intracellular androgen receptor. It has been hypothesized that DHT may provide an amplification mechanism for testosterone, which could be a beneficial adaptation in men with low circulating testosterone. The recognition of the central role of DHT in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has changed the way the disease is viewed and has led to the introduction of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors, which can prevent and retard the progression of BPH by suppressing DHT synthesis. The 5alpha-reductase inhibitors decrease prostate volume. In doing so they improve symptoms and urinary flow, and decrease the risks of acute urinary retention and the need for BPH related surgery. The predominant drug related adverse events with 5alpha-reductase inhibitors are reproductive events, that is typically decreased libido, impotence and ejaculatory dysfunction. These events occur in a minority of men and tend to decrease with a longer treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: DHT appears to have an obligatory role in the development of BPH. The role of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors in the treatment of BPH has been firmly established with an adverse events profile that is suitable for long-term use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".