MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131901019 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2004.827594

Pel reconstruction on FPGA-augmented TriMedia

2004· article· en· W2131901019 on OpenAlexaff
Mihai Sima, Sorin Cotöfană, S. Vassiliadis, J.T.J. van Eijndhoven, Kees Vissers

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceControl reconfigurationContext (archaeology)Decoding methodsParallel computingReconfigurable computingInverseComputer architectureEmbedded systemComputer hardwareAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a TriMedia processor extended with three reconfigurable designs for entropy decoding (ED), inverse quantization (IQ), and two-dimensional (2-D) inverse discrete cosine transform (IDCT), and assesses the performance gain that is provided by such extensions when performing MPEG2-compliant pel reconstruction. We first describe an extension of the TriMedia architecture, which consists of a multiple-context field programmable gate array (FPGA)-based reconfigurable functional unit (RFU), a configuration unit managing the reconfiguration of the RFU, and their associated instructions. Then, we address the computation of the ED, IQ, and 2-D IDCT tasks, and propose to provide reconfigurable hardware support for a variable-length decoder that can decode two symbols per call (VLD-2), an inverse quantizer that can dequantize four coefficients per call (IQ-4), and an 1-D IDCT (1-D IDCT). The most important aspects concerning the implementation of the FPGA-mapped VLD-2, IQ-4, and 1-D IDCT units, as well as the organization of the software routines calling these FPGA-mapped computing units are outlined. Experimental results indicate that by configuring each of the VLD-2, IQ-4, and 1-D IDCT units on a different FPGA context, and by activating the contexts as needed, the FPGA-augmented TriMedia can perform MPEG2-compliant pel reconstruction with an average speed-up of 1.4/spl times/ over the standard TriMedia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207