MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W213190669

Indigenous Screen Cultures/Feeling Canadian: Television, Nationalism and Affect

2012· article· en· W213190669 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Hutchison

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWelshNationalismIndigenousMedia studiesFeelingHistorySociologyPolitical sciencePoliticsLawPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sigurjon Baldur Hafsteinsson and Marian Bredin (eds), Indigenous Screen Cultures (Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2010), 216 pp. Cased. $55. ISBN 978-0-88755- 190-1. Paper. $27.95. ISBN 978 -0-88755-718-7. Marusya Bociurkiw, Feeling Canadian: Television, Nationalism and Affect (Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2011), 192 pp. Paper. $32.95. ISBN 978-1-55458-268-6. For indigenous language communities broadcasting has long been regarded as crucial in the struggle to preserve their sense of nationhood and their cultures. In the UK for example, Welsh language and Scots Gaelic radio programming are long established but television services are much more recent. The Welsh S4C, which went on air in 1982, only came into being after a Welsh Nationalist MP threatened to fast to death unless the Thatcher government kept its promise to establish such a service; BBC Alba began transmission in 2008 after a long and determined, but less melodramatic, campaign. These services have been generally, if sometimes grudgingly, welcomed. Critics draw attention to the high cost per thousand viewers and the variable quality of the programming, but such responses cut little ice with the relevant language communities who believe that historical injustices are being at least partially remedied. The collection of essays edited by Marian Bredin and Sigurjon Baldur Hafsteinsson discusses the development of Aboriginal media in Canada, a country which is generally regarded as having done well by its Native peoples on the media front, and far better than its southern neighbour. The Aboriginal Peoples Television Network is central to the discussion. Beginning operations in 1992 as a Northern service and utilizing English and several Native languages, it became a national service financed by subscription and advertising in 1999. Lorna Roth, in charting its development, acknowledges the unevenness of the programming but argues that it 'offers a symbolic mediated space for indigenous and non- Native peoples to mingle and to communicate their common interests' (p. 32). In her chapter, Jennifer David observes that there has been no systematic research on the overall impact of broadcasting on the survival of indigenous languages, and makes the point that research on television audience reactions shows that people are happy to consume programmes in their own language but do not want to have to put up with other people's languages. In his own chapter, Hafsteinsson looks at the ways in which news is presented: not surprisingly, its content is very much oriented to Native concerns. In her chapter, Bredin examines the contrast between the ideal viewer envisaged by the APTN and the actual viewers, most of whom inevitably - and perhaps even gratifyingly - are non-indigenous. Offering a wide range of programmes is financially challenging, so much is bought in from independent companies and from elsewhere in the world. But there to be celebrated is Moccasin Flats, a six-part drama series set in Regina, which offered a gritty and realistic portrayal of life for Native people in a contemporary urban environment. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Canadian StudiesSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207