MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131964142 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2008.927386

Efficient Finite-Difference Time-Domain Modeling of Driven Periodic Structures and Related Microwave Circuit Applications

2008· article· en· W2131964142 on OpenAlexaff
Dongying Li, Costas D. Sarris

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodMicrowaveWidebandTransmission lineBandwidth (computing)Electronic engineeringTime domainSineTrigonometric functionsConvergence (economics)Finite difference methodComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsOpticsMathematical analysisMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsGeometryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sine-cosine method for the finite-difference time-domain-based dispersion analysis of periodic structures is extended to incorporate the presence of nonperiodic wideband sources. A new formulation of this method is presented to clearly demonstrate that it can be employed for the characterization of periodic structures over a broad bandwidth. Moreover, its coupling with the array-scanning technique enables the incorporation of nonperiodic sources, thus enabling the fast characterization of driven periodic structures in the time domain via a small number of low-cost simulations. The convergence, accuracy, and efficiency of the proposed method is demonstrated with its application to the analysis of a negative-refractive-index transmission-line ldquoperfect lensrdquo and the successful comparison of simulated with experimental results. Finally, a modified version of this method is proposed for the accelerated simulation of microwave circuit geometries printed on periodic substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207