Commentary: The Role of Memory in Managing Children’s Distress During Medical Procedures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most universal experiences in childhood is the need to undergo medical procedures. Whether they be vaccinations, diagnostic, or treatment procedures, many children find invasive medical procedures to be distressing. Thus for pediatric psychologists, there is a pressing need to learn more about how to reduce chil-dren’s distress during medical procedures. Salmon et al. have taken on this topic in investigating the effects of two different psychological interventions on children’s distress and memory during a voiding cysto-urethrogram (VCUG). The investigators tested the efficacy of providing distraction (a cartoon video) on top of standard care (limited procedural information), as well as the efficacy of providing complete information about the procedure plus the cartoon video compared with standard care alone in a sample of 2- to 7-year olds. This study advances the field in that it compels researchers to move beyond using only distraction tech-niques as interventions for procedure-related distress. Although distraction is a useful technique that has
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.055 | 0.044 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".