Cerebellar vermian atrophy after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although pathologic evidence of cerebellar injury due to birth asphyxia is well described, neuroimaging evidence is sparse. The primary purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the early and late imaging findings in the cerebellum of patients who had neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy with thalamic edema shown by neonatal CT. The secondary aims were to validate thalamic edema shown by neonatal CT as a marker of thalamic injury and to assess the late cerebral cortical abnormalities associated with neonatal thalamic edema. METHODS: Fifty-five neonates with thalamic edema shown by CT performed when patients were 3 days old were identified from a cohort of full-term neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Twenty-six of the 55 underwent follow-up neuroimaging. All sonograms, CT scans, and MR images of the brains of the 55 neonates were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric neuroradiologists. The examinations were reviewed for evidence of hemorrhage, edema, atrophy, and CT attenuation or MR signal intensity abnormalities in the cerebellum, basal ganglia, and cerebral cortex. The neonatal autopsy findings in four cases were reviewed separately by a pediatric neuropathologist. RESULTS: Of the 55 neonates with thalamic edema shown by neonatal CT, 28 (51%) had thalamic edema with diffuse cerebral cortical edema, and 27 (49%) had thalamic edema without diffuse cortical edema. The cerebellar vermes appeared normal on all neonatal sonograms, CT scans, and MR images. However, atrophy of the cerebellar vermis was found in 12 (46%) of 26 patients by use of follow-up studies (95% CI, 27-65%). One of the 12 patients also had cerebellar hemispheric atrophy. Cerebellar vermian atrophy was shown at follow-up in eight (67%) of 12 patients who had neonatal thalamic edema with cortical sparing, compared with four (29%) of 14 patients who had thalamic edema with diffuse cortical edema. The difference did not reach statistical significance. The thalami appeared abnormal on follow-up neuroimages in 25 of 26 cases. Different patterns of cortical atrophy were observed on the images of patients who had thalamic edema with cortical sparing compared with those obtained in patients who had thalamic edema with cortical involvement. CONCLUSION: Cerebellar vermian atrophy is a frequent finding on follow-up images of patients in whom neonatal CT showed hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy with abnormal thalami.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".