MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132006331 · doi:10.1002/cjoc.201180395

Effect of Explicit Water Molecules on the Color‐Tuning Mechanism of the Firefly

2011· article· en· W2132006331 on OpenAlex
Chungang Min, Lu-Yi Zou, Ying Sun, Jing‐Fu Guo, Ai‐Min Ren, John D. Goddard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryBenzothiazoleMoleculeThiazoleSpectral lineAqueous solutionPhotochemistryAqueous mediumChemical physicsStereochemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The contributions of explicit water molecules to color‐tuning mechanism of firefly were studied. The explicit water molecules cause two different structures in the geometrical parameters of keto(‐1) both in vacuo and aqueous solution. There are somewhat larger influences on absorption and emission spectra. When water molecules were added only on the side of benzothiazole ring, the spectra shift to the blue. In contrast, when waters were added only on the side of the thiazoline ring, the spectra shift to red. In a word, the color modulation of the emitted light depends on charge redistribution of molecule keto(‐1), mainly the charge change of the benzothiazole and thiazole rings at the two terminal in keto(‐1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it