MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132019270 · doi:10.5589/m04-037

Investigation of the nonlinear hydrologic response to precipitation forcing in physically based land surface modeling

2004· article· en· W2132019270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterOffice of ScienceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationForcing (mathematics)Rain gaugeLand coverClimatologySatelliteMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesLand useGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with the effect of precipitation forcing on land surface hydrological variables predicted by a physically based land surface scheme. The aspects considered are the differences in precipitation input across varying sensor measurements and temporal scales of aggregation. Precipitation accumulations at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 6-h time scales are derived on the basis of standard 5-min rain gauge rainfall measurements, hourly rain gauge calibrated WSR-88D radar rainfall estimates, and passive microwave calibrated half-hourly satellite infrared rain retrievals. The spatial resolution of the rainfall estimates is fixed to 1° grid boxes. The off-line community land model (CLM) is used to simulate land surface parameters on the basis of external meteorological forcing parameters. The study region and data consist of two vegetation-distinct (high and low vegetation cover) sites in Oklahoma. The data used include one warm season (May–August 2002) of in situ meteorological data from the Oklahoma Mesonet. The CLM is forced with the three different rainfall input datasets for varying temporal scales (1–6 h). Relative difference statistics in terms of rainfall and land surface parameters are presented between the two remote sensing rain retrievals and the gauge rainfall measurements used as reference. Results show that the hydrological response is nonlinear and strongly dependent on the error characteristics of the retrieval (e.g., more temporal correlated rainfall error results in higher error propagation in land surface parameters). We also investigate the temporal lag correlation of the error in rainfall with the error in the various land surface hydrological variables. Time resolution is shown to have an effect on the error statistics of the hydrologic variables. Coarse time resolutions are associated with errors of lower variance and higher correlation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it