Adaptive multi-agent architecture for functional sequence motifs recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Accurate genome annotation or protein function prediction requires precise recognition of functional sequence motifs. Many computational motif prediction models have been proposed. Due to the complexity of the biological data, it may be desirable to apply an integrated approach that uses multiple models for analysis. RESULTS: In this article, we propose a novel multi-agent architecture for the general purpose of functional sequence motif recognition. The approach takes advantage of the synergy provided by multiple agents through the employment of different agents equipped with distinctive problem solving skills and promotes the collaborations among them through decision maker (DM) agents that work as classifier ensembles. A genetic algorithm-based fusion strategy is applied which offers evolutionary property to the DM agents. The consistency and robustness of the system are maintained by an evolvable agent that mediates the team of the ensemble agents. The combined effort of a recommendation system (Seer) and the self-learning mediator agent yields a successful identification of the most efficient agent deployment scheme at an early stage of the experimentation process, which has the potential of greatly reducing the computational cost of the system. Two concrete systems are constructed that aim at predicting two important sequence motifs-the translational initiation sites (TISs) and the core promoters. With the incorporation of three distinctive problem solver agents, the TIS predictor consistently outperforms most of the state-of-the-art approaches under investigation. Integrating three existing promoter predictors, our system is able to yield consistently good performance. AVAILABILITY: The program (MotifMAS) and the datasets are available upon request.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".