MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132066959 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2010.2064797

Energy Provisioning in Solar-Powered Wireless Mesh Networks

2010· article· en· W2132066959 on OpenAlexaff
Ghada Badawy, Amir A. Sayegh, T.D. Todd

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvisioningComputer scienceComputer networkSoftware deploymentDistributed computingNode (physics)Resource (disambiguation)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar-powered wireless mesh nodes must be provisioned with a solar panel and battery combination that is sufficient to prevent node outage. This is normally done using historical solar insolation data for the desired deployment location and based on a temporal bandwidth usage profile (BUP) for each deployed node. Unfortunately, conventional methodologies do not take into account the use of energy-aware routing, and therefore, the deployed system may be overprovisioned and unnecessarily expensive. In this paper, we consider this resource assignment problem with the objective of minimizing the network deployment cost for a given energy source assignment. We first propose a resource-provisioning algorithm based on the use of temporal shortest-path routing and taking into account the node energy flow for the target deployment time period. We then introduce a methodology that incorporates energy-aware routing into the resource-assignment procedure. A genetic algorithm (GA) has been developed for this purpose. Our results show the large cost savings that an energy-aware resource assignment can achieve when compared with that done using the conventional methodology. To evaluate the quality of the resource assignments, we also develop a linear programming formulation that gives a lower bound on the total network resource assignment. Our results show that significant resource savings are possible using the proposed algorithms and the potential resource assignment benefits of energy-aware routing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207