MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132111672 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450830402

A Review of Recent Technological Advances in the Brightening of High‐Yield Pulps

2005· review· en· W2132111672 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yonghao Ni

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced oxidation water treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeroxidePulp and paper industryProcess engineeringPulp (tooth)Yield (engineering)Paper productionProcess (computing)ChemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringComputer scienceMetallurgyEngineeringMechanical engineeringOrganic chemistryDentistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Peroxide brightening/bleaching is an important unit operation for pulp and paper mills producing value‐added paper grades containing bleached mechanical pulps. In this paper, a number of process innovations have been discussed. They include: hydrosulphite assisted chelation process, the so‐called Q y process; DTPA spray; P N 2 process; P M process; Mg(OH) 2 ‐based peroxide process. It will be shown that these processes can improve the peroxide brightening/bleaching processes in terms of (1) decreasing the production cost, (2) improving the product quality, and (3) decreasing the environmental impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced oxidation water treatmentFrench-language works237,207