MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132117845 · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddt355

A genome-wide association scan (GWAS) for mean telomere length within the COGS project: identified loci show little association with hormone-related cancer risk

2013· article· en· W2132117845 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Karen A. Pooley, Stig E. Bojesen, Maren Weischer, Sune F. Nielsen, Deborah J. Thompson, Ali Amin Al Olama, Kyriaki Michailidou, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Sara Benlloch, Judith Brown, Tina Audley, Robert Luben, K-T Khaw, David E. Neal, Freddie C. Hamdy, Jenny Donovan, Zsofia Kote‐Jarai, Caroline Baynes, Mitul Shah, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Ed Dicks, Rongxi Yang, Anja Rudolph, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Jenny Chang‐Claude, Barbara Burwinkel, Georgia Chenevix‐Trench, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Andrew Berchuck, Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas F. Easton, Alison M. Dunning, Børge G. Nordestgaard

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Molecular Genetics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCancer Research UKMcGill University
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsGenotypingBreast cancerProstate cancerGenetic associationCancerTelomereInternal medicineOncologyGenotypeMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mean telomere length (TL) in blood cells is heritable and has been reported to be associated with risks of several diseases, including cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of three GWAS for TL (total n=2240) and selected 1629 variants for replication via the "iCOGS" custom genotyping array. All ∼200 000 iCOGS variants were analysed with TL, and those displaying associations in healthy controls (n = 15 065) were further tested in breast cancer cases (n = 11 024). We found a novel TL association (Ptrend < 4 × 10(-10)) at 3p14.4 close to PXK and evidence (Ptrend < 7 × 10(-7)) for TL loci at 6p22.1 (ZNF311) and 20q11.2 (BCL2L1). We additionally confirmed (Ptrend < 5 × 10(-14)) the previously reported loci at 3q26.2 (TERC), 5p15.3 (TERT) and 10q24.3 (OBFC1) and found supportive evidence (Ptrend < 5 × 10(-4)) for the published loci at 2p16.2 (ACYP2), 4q32.2 (NAF1) and 20q13.3 (RTEL1). SNPs tagging these loci explain TL differences of up to 731 bp (corresponding to 18% of total TL in healthy individuals), however, they display little direct evidence for association with breast, ovarian or prostate cancer risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations145
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Molecular GeneticsSame topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceFrench-language works237,207