MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2132149605

Short report: parental knowledge of rectal acetaminophen.

2002· article· fr· W2132149605 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ran D. Goldman, Dennis Scolnik

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcetaminophenAntipyreticTest (biology)ComplaintFamily medicinePediatricsStatistical significanceAnalgesicAnesthesiaInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

F ever is one of the most common complaints in clinical pediatrics. Acetaminophen is used most frequently to treat children because of its antipyretic and analgesic effects and because it is relatively safe. Oral administration is the route of choice in daily practice, but in some circumstances this route is impractical, such as when a child cannot tolerate oral solutions or solids or before and during operations. Rectal administration of acetaminophen is then a feasible alternative. We hypothesized that many of the parents arriving in our pediatric emergency department with their febrile children did not know acetaminophen was available in rectal form. We interviewed 231 randomly chosen caregivers of children aged 28 days to 16 years if their children’s main complaint was fever (temperature higher than 38°C) and if the children had been given acetaminophen at home during the preceding 24 hours. We received ethical approval from the Research Institute Ethics Committee at the Hospital for Sick Children. Interviews were conducted by a research assistant before the children were examined by a pediatrician. Parents were enrolled during a 6-month period from September 2000 to February 2001. No parent refused to be interviewed. Data on demographics, awareness of the existence of rectal acetaminophen, history of vomiting and diarrhea, and highest temperature measured at home were collected and put into the Microsoft Excel program. Statistical analysis was done with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 8.0 for Windows. The χ test was used for comparing frequencies and Student’s t test for comparing continuous variables; P values < .05 were considered significant. Of the 231 participating parents, 78 (33.6%) were aware of the rectal form of acetaminophen. Average age of the children was 34 ± 33 months (range 1 to 208). Mean duration of fever before coming to the emergency department was 4 ± 1.7 days (range 1 to 6 days); 44 (19%) had vomiting, and 14 (6%) had diarrhea as part of their illness. We found no significant correlations between parental knowledge of the availability of rectal acetaminophen and children’s age, parental age, parental education, number of children in the family, whether the child was first-born, or whether the illness involved vomiting or diarrhea. Parents who did not speak English at home, however, knew less about rectal acetaminophen (38% versus 24% respectively, P = .03) (Table 1). In this prospective study, we found that only one third of parents administering acetaminophen at home for a febrile illness knew about the rectal route. No previous study reported Canadian parents’ knowledge on this topic. The absence of such knowledge was correlated with English not being spoken at home but with no other demographic or educational factor or child’s age. Acetaminophen has been commercially available as an antipyretic and analgesic drug since the 1950s and has been used far more than any other analgesic-antipyretic. It is used for treating fever by up to 78% of parents, especially parents of young children. The dose of oral and rectal acetaminophen currently recommended ranges from 10 to 20 mg/kg, although in the last few years, single larger doses of rectal acetaminophen were required to achieve a serum concentration of 10 to 20 μg/mL (66 to 132 mM), a concentration known to be antipyretic. During childhood febrile illnesses, many doses are needed; hence, use of higher doses in these cases needs further investigation. Parents regard lowering high temperatures to be of prime importance, especially in younger infants. They are particularly distressed and liable Dr Goldman and Dr Scolnik are staff physicians in the Division of Emergency Services at the Hospital for Sick Children and Dr Goldman is an Associate Professor in the Departent of Paediatrics at the University of Toronto in Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicPediatric Pain Management Techniques→French-language works237,207→