MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132173431 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1999.829985

Reference queue tracking strategies for delay guarantees in ATM networks

2003· article· en· W2132173431 on OpenAlexaff
M. Vishnu, J.W. Mark

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQueueComputer networkScheduling (production processes)Real-time computingMultilevel queueQueueing theoryMultiplexerQueue management systemMultiplexingMathematicsMathematical optimizationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A class of service scheduling schemes called the reference queue tracking (RQT) schemes is identified, and their ability to provide delay bounds on a per-VC basis is studied. A statistical multiplexer appears to an incoming VC stream as a single server queue whose service rate (bandwidth) is controlled by the service scheduling scheme. We refer to this queue as the virtual connection queue (VCQ). Corresponding to each VCQ, the RQT schemes use a fictitious single server reference queue (RQ) which is also fed with the VC stream but which is served at a constant rate equal to the allocated bandwidth of the VC. The RQT schemes serve VCs in such a way that some selected parameters of the VCQs track those of the corresponding RQs. An important property of a service scheduling scheme is the ability to guarantee that no cells depart from the VCQs later than from the corresponding RQs. Four schemes belonging to the RQT class are identified and their ability to satisfy the above property is investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207