MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132190221 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2008.916632

Combining Artificial Neural Network Models, Geostatistics, and Passive Microwave Data for Snow Water Equivalent Retrieval and Mapping

2008· article· en· W2132190221 on OpenAlexaffabout
N. Evora, Dominique Tapsoba, Danielle De Sève

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkBrightness temperatureComputer scienceRemote sensingAncillary dataKrigingGeostatisticsSpecial sensor microwave/imagerPixelStreamflowSnowFeedforward neural networkData miningMicrowaveArtificial intelligenceMeteorologyMachine learningGeologySpatial variabilityGeographyMathematicsCartographyDrainage basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new modeling framework combining neural-network-based models, passive microwave data, and geostatistics is proposed for snow water equivalent (SWE) retrieval and mapping. Brightness temperature data from the seven-channel special sensor microwave/imager and the interpolated minimum temperature are the inputs of a multilayer feedforward neural network (MFF). Kriging with an external drift algorithm is applied to ground-based SWE data to produce gridded SWE data that are used as the target of the neural network. An optimal division of the sample of available pixels is achieved by a self-organizing feature map. Prediction error is used for model selection and is assessed by bootstrap. It is shown that a committee of a network containing neural networks with different architectures can provide consistent SWE retrievals. This modeling framework is applied for SWE retrieval and mapping over La Grande River basin in north eastern Quebec (Canada). The results are very promising for operational purposes particularly for SWE mapping during periods with no ground measurements and operational streamflow forecasting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207