MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132202990 · doi:10.1109/icc.2009.5199137

Linear Precoding for Multiuser MIMO Systems with Multiple Base Stations

2009· article· en· W2132202990 on OpenAlexaff
Imad H. Azzam, Raviraj Adve

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoBlackberry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkPrecodingMIMOAsynchronous communicationBase stationComputer scienceZero-forcing precodingDuality (order theory)Interference (communication)Electronic engineeringAlgorithmComputer networkMathematicsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Linear precoding for multiuser multiple input multiple output (MIMO) cellular systems has generally focused on a single isolated cell. A crucial tool in algorithm development has been a downlink/uplink duality. Here we investigate downlink multiuser communications across multiple cells. Previous work identified the resulting asynchronous interference as a key issue. We prove the existence of a downlink/uplink duality requiring time reversal. This duality is used to develop an effective linear precoding algorithm for multiuser, multi-cell, MIMO systems. Simulation results illustrate the importance of accounting for, and to quantify the loss due to, asynchronous interference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207