Western Europe and the Challenge of the "Unipolar Moment": Is Multipolarity the Answer?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There have been few more controversial statements made in recent debates about American foreign policy than the assertion that America and the world have been experiencing, since the ending of the Cold War, a moment. To some, this holds out the prospect for a structuring of the international system according to American preferences for ordered liberty. Others see in the mooted unipolar moment great peril, and little promise; for them, it simply constitutes a way of masking the dangers of hegemony and even empire. Some of the most vociferous of the critics are to be found among America's transatlantic allies, and above all, in France. It is often said in French circles that multipolarity can be the only cure for the ailments of a unipolar system. This article examines that claim, and concludes that notwithstanding the rhetoric and logical implications of multipolarity, there is no evidence that the Western Europeans as a group are balancing against the United States, or even that they wish to balance against it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".