Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours de la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle, au moment précis où le temps exerçait l'emprise la plus pressante et la plus oppressante qui soit (voir notamment Darwin, Clausius et Schopenhauer), l'espace me paraît s'être substitué au temps comme expérience première de l'être au monde. Si Rimbaud échoue, certes, dans sa tentative de tuer le temps par une sorte d'accélération éperdue, il est en revanche le premier à le prendre au piège de l'espace, d'un espace poétique fait de simultanéité et de réversibilité.Mallarmé puis Valéry et Apollinaire feront de ce nouvel espace, proprement phénoménologique, le lieu où le Moi (celui de l'auteur comme celui du lecteur) pourra se frayer sa propre voie, à la rencontre ou à l'encontre de lui-même - inaugurant ainsi le XXe siècle au cours duquel l'écriture ne prendra sens, dans une large mesure, qu'à former cet espace où, littéralement, un Moi peut s'inventer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".