MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132280214 · doi:10.1002/qj.2185

Four‐dimensional tensor equations for a classical fluid in an external gravitational field

2013· article· en· W2132280214 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Charron, Ayrton Zadra, Claude Girard

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristoffel symbolsFormalism (music)Covariant transformationGravitational fieldClassical mechanicsMetric tensorField equationGravitationPhysicsConservation lawEquations of motionLanczos tensorMathematical physicsEinstein tensorTensor densityTensor fieldExact solutions in general relativityMathematicsRiemann curvature tensorMathematical analysisGeometryCurvature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A four‐dimensional tensor formalism suitable for the equations of motion of a classical fluid in the presence of a given external gravitational field is presented. The formalism allows for arbitrary time‐dependent transformations of spatial coordinates. Some well‐known conservation laws are derived in covariant form. The metric tensor and the associated Christoffel symbols are calculated for coordinate systems useful in meteorology. The vertical momentum equation employed in the Canadian operational weather forecasting model is obtained using the proposed tensor formalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207