MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132301839 · doi:10.1109/icc.2007.1040

The Effect of Imperfect Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation on OFDMA Uplink Transmission

2007· article· en· W2132301839 on OpenAlexaff
Z. Zhang, Chintha Tellambura

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkCarrier frequency offsetOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessElectronic engineeringFrequency offsetBit error rateFrequency-division multiple accessInterference (communication)Offset (computer science)Transmission (telecommunications)Signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioTelecommunicationsEngineeringPower (physics)Decoding methodsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since carrier frequency offset destroys user's signal orthogonality in orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing access (OFDMA) uplink transmission, resulting in an interference-limited system, its estimation/correction is very important. The residual carrier frequency offset of each user contributes inter-carrier-interference (ICI) and multiple-user-interference (MUI) to other users. In this paper, the effect of the carrier frequency offset on OFDMA uplink is analyzed. We first analyze the average uplink capacity losses as well as the signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio (SINR) reduction due to the carrier frequency offsets, and then discuss the capacity increases by using adaptive power allocation. The averaged bit error rate (BER) performance with the carrier frequency offsets on OFDMA uplink is also analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207