MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132304073 · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-s1-p365

Sharp transitions of gamma coherence in inhibitory networks occur when a biological context and constraints are imposed

2013· article· en· W2132304073 on OpenAlexafffund
Katie Ferguson, Carey Y. L. Huh, Bénédicte Amilhon, Sylvain Williams, Frances K. Skinner

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Neuroscience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteUniversity Health Network
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of OntarioCompute Canada
KeywordsInhibitory postsynaptic potentialCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Context (archaeology)NeuroscienceComputer sciencePsychologyStatistical physicsCognitive scienceCognitive psychologyPhysicsBiologyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From several experimental and modeling studies, it has become apparent that networks of parvalbumin-positive (PV+), fast-firing interneurons play an essential role in generating population gamma rhythms [1]. Many features of these perisomatically-inhibiting PV+ cell networks influence the generation of gamma oscillations, a number of which have been explored in network models [2,3]. These include the synaptic delay, the decay time constant of the postsynaptic conductance, and whether the reversal potential is hyperpolarizing or shunting. While it is clear that all these features affect whether and how much coherence occurs at gamma frequencies, it is much less clear which features (i.e. parameters and parameter balances) may be essential in various biological contexts. To address this, we used our previously constructed network model of hippocampal CA1 PV+ cells [4]. Network size, connectivity, and cellular components would all be expected to affect the network dynamics. Thus, experimental data from an intact hippocampus in vitro was used to obtain a clear biological context, and importantly, the amount of input that these cells receive during ongoing theta population activities was estimated. Using these cellular components and input characteristics, we found that coherent gamma oscillations could emerge within experimental constraints for particular parameter balances. Here we investigate the effect of appropriately sized and connected networks. Each cell in the network received excitatory input (Iapplied ), which was heterogeneous across cells, and synaptic inhibition from presynaptic interneurons, which had a particular maximal conductance value (gPV). We systematically varied gPV and Iapplied within the experimentally determined ranges, and determined the coherence of the network model population firing and the network frequency for each combination of these values. For each of these network simulation sets, we also varied the connectivity probability as well as network size to explore how these factors affect the network’s ability to produce coherent network firing. We find that when our connection probability is similar to what has been found experimentally, our networks exhibit a sharp transition from random firing to network coherence with only a small change in Iapplied. However, as connectivity in the network is increased beyond experimentally estimated values, this sharp transition disappears. Instead, a larger window of coherence is achieved, but with a smooth transition from random to coherent firing. Similarly, decreasing the network size increases the window of coherent firing, and while these sharp transitions remain for changing network sizes, the parameter regimes in which they occur changes significantly when the network size becomes much smaller than experimental estimates. Our work indicates that CA1 fastspiking PV+ networks are capable of producing gamma population rhythms, and that perturbation in and out of coherent states can occur abruptly given the sharp transitions obtained in our network simulations. Since our simulations approximate a biological context, it may be that gating in and out of coherence is a design property to allow generation of theta/gamma network oscillations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NeuroscienceSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207