MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The expression of stem cell factor and c‐kit receptor in human asthmatic airways

2004· article· en· W2132334122 on OpenAlexaff
Saleh Al‐Muhsen, G. Shablovsky, Ron Olivenstein, Bruce Mazer, Qutayba Hamid

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical & Experimental Allergy · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChristie (Canada)Royal Victoria HospitalMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStem cell factorIn situ hybridizationBronchoalveolar lavageReceptorEosinophilPathologyImmunocytochemistryMast cellEpitheliumInterleukin 13PathogenesisImmunologyAsthmaBiologyMedicineInternal medicineMessenger RNAStem cellCytokineInterleukin 4LungCell biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Asthmatic airways are characterized by infiltration with a variety of inflammatory cells such as mast cells and eosinophils. Stem cell factor (SCF) is an important activating and chemotactic factor for both mast cells and eosinophils. In addition, it is a critical growth and differentiation factor for mast cells. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the contribution of SCF to the pathogenesis of asthma, we examined the expression of SCF and its receptor c-kit in bronchial biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens obtained from asthmatic subjects (n=13) and non-asthmatic control subjects (n=10). METHODS: SCF and c-kit were detected by in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunocytochemistry (ICC). In order to phenotype the cells expressing SCF and c-kit in asthmatic tissue and BAL cells, combined ISH and ICC were also performed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (P<0.001) in the SCF mRNA expression in asthmatic airway epithelium (70.38+/-12.33% positive cells) compared with controls (12.7+/-17.21% positive cells). There was also a significant difference in subepithelial SCF-mRNA expression, being higher in asthmatics (P<0.001). A significant difference was also found in c-kit receptor mRNA expression in asthmatic biopsies both in epithelium (P<0.001) and subepithelium (P<0.05) compared with controls. ICC results were consistent with the ISH for both SCF and c-kit receptor from asthmatics and controls. The SCF and c-kit receptor mRNA and immunoreactivity in cells recovered from bronchial washing were also significantly higher in asthmatics compared with controls (P<0.05). While SCF expression was localized predominantly in the epithelial layer in bronchial biopsy tissues, alveolar macrophages were found to be the major source of SCF in bronchial washing from asthmatic subjects. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate the increased expression of SCF and its receptor, c-kit within human asthmatic airways, which suggests an important role of this cytokine in the pathophysiology of asthma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical & Experimental AllergySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207