MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132364133 · doi:10.1002/sia.1630

Parametric analysis of the extraction of depth profile information from ARXPS data obtained on a silicon wafer sample

2003· article· en· W2132364133 on OpenAlexafffund
R.W. Paynter, D. Nolet

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsWaferX-ray photoelectron spectroscopySample (material)Parametric statisticsSiliconSurface (topology)MathematicsDependency (UML)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Set (abstract data type)Extraction (chemistry)Computational physicsMaterials scienceChemistryStatisticsComputer scienceGeometryPhysicsOptoelectronicsChromatographyNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study a silicon wafer was analysed by angle‐resolved x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and the data compared with a calculation based upon a simple model of the sample surface. The parameters in the mathematical model were varied in groups of three and the sum‐squared difference between the calculation and the experimental results was plotted as an error surface. Most of the error surfaces were found to exhibit a well‐constrained minimum, indicating an optimum set of values for the parameters in question, but important examples of co‐dependency were also noted. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurface and Interface AnalysisSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207