MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2132366600 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2001.976089

The spatial variability of summer sea ice in the Amundsen Sea seen from MODIS, RADARSAT SCANSAR and LANDSAT 7 ETM+ images

2002· article· en· W2132366600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shusun Li, Xiaobing Zhou, K. Morris, Martin O. Jeffries

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsSea iceModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerRemote sensingSatelliteThematic MapperSynthetic aperture radarCloud coverEnvironmental scienceGeologySatellite imageryMeteorologyClimatologyGeographyCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The summer sea ice extent, concentration and zonation in the Southern Ocean is investigated using three new satellite sensors. They are the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on the first NASA Earth Observing System (EOS) satellite, Terra, the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) on the first Canadian Space Agency Radarsat satellite, and the Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) on the NASA Landsat 7 satellite. A large number of images of these satellite sensors were acquired in February and March 2000, when a sea ice field campaign was conducted aboard the U.S. research vessel Nathaniel B. Palmer. MODIS images acquired under clear sky conditions provide regional information of the spatial variability of the austral sea ice cover. Mosaics of Radarsat images present complemental information under various weather conditions and fill the MODIS information gap caused by cloudiness. ETM+ images give detailed information of the characteristics of individual ice zones, including the landfast, coastal polynyas, pack ice, and pancake and cake ice zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→