MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132389230 · doi:10.1109/time.2009.22

Timed Contact Algebras

2009· article· en· W2132389230 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Logic
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsAxiomContext (archaeology)Extension (predicate logic)Computer scienceSet (abstract data type)SpacetimeRelation (database)Set theoryAlgebra over a fieldMathematicsTheoretical computer sciencePure mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Timed contact algebras constitute an approach to a temporal version of a region based theory of space. The general theory does not provide a notion of an underlying static world, i.e. it does not explicitly contain a set of non moving regions. Furthermore, the model of time does not have any structure, i.e. time is neither ordered nor required to be discrete or continuous. In this paper we want to investigate two extensions of the basic theory. The first extension considers grounded timed contact algebras that make the underlying static world explicit. In this context we introduce the Axiom of Construction that relates the existence of certain regions and the time structure for the first time. The second addition is given by a betweenness relation on the set of time. In this context we introduce the Axiom of Continuity (CONT), ensuring "smooth'' movement of regions through time. Last but not least, we show that both axioms together do not allow finite models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Algebra and LogicFrench-language works237,207