Bringing out the Acid: Noël Coward, Harold Pinter, Ivy Compton-Burnett and the Uses of Camp
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Noël Coward's most famous plays fit closely with Sontag's description of the primary attributes of camp: flippant, stylized, ironic and self-consciously theatrical, artificial. But where Sontag defines the camp sensibility as disengaged and depoliticized, this article argues that Coward deploys a form of linguistic camp to destabilize judgements and challenge orthodoxies. As his characters switch rapidly and seamlessly among different linguistic registers and their associated sets of values and assumptions, any sense of normative or self-evident values is dissipated. Coward singled out Harold Pinter from all the “new wave” dramatists of the fifties and sixties, admiring him as a genuine original using language brilliantly and describing him as a “sort of Cockney Ivy Compton-Burnett.” Pinter and Compton-Burnett share Coward's particular form of linguistic camp, and their characters can be seen to deploy it to similar disruptive ends, unsettling moral and sexual judgements and challenging orthodoxy's claim to normality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".