MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132406084 · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.04.004

Effectiveness of Aquatic Exercise for Obese Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2010· article· en· W2132406084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jae‐Young Lim, Esther Tchai, Soong‐Nang Jang

Bibliographic record

VenuePM&R · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Health and Welfare
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyBody mass indexRandomized controlled trialKnee painRehabilitationOutpatient clinicPsychological interventionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To design an aquatic exercise (AQE) and land-based exercise (LBE) program to enhance knee function and reduce body fat in patients with obesity and knee osteoarthritis and to investigate the effectiveness of AQE and LBE on body fat, functional fitness, and functional status. SETTING: Outpatient clinic at a Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Obese patients with knee osteoarthritis were recruited from patients who visited the rehabilitation, orthopedic surgery, and geriatric outpatient clinics at the hospital. Study participants were limited to those who met the following criteria: body mass index more than 25 kg/m(2), abdominal circumference more than 90 cm (men) or 85 cm (women), clinically diagnosed osteoarthritis with Kellgren-Lawrence scale 2 or higher on radiographic studies, and independent ambulation state. METHODS: Participants were randomly allocated into 3 groups: AQE (n = 26), LBE (n = 25), and the control group (n = 24). Exercise interventions were conducted 3 times a week for 8 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Body fat analysis, brief pain inventory, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities' osteoarthritis index, Short Form-36 questionnaire, and knee isokinetic tests were evaluated to assess changes in body fat composition, pain, physical function, and quality of life before and after the exercise program. RESULTS: Although no significant difference was found in general characteristics among the 3 groups before exercise, body fat proportion in the AQE group decreased significantly (mean +/- SD, from 34.4 +/- 4.7 to 33.3 +/- 4.7; P = .031) after intervention. The body mass index was slightly reduced after intervention, but it was not statistically significant. The AQE group showed significant improvements in pain, disability, and quality of life. Notably, the change in pain interference in the AQE group (mean +/- SD, from 25.8 +/- 15.1 to 18.8 +/- 13.1; P = .009) was greater than that of the LBE group. Both exercise groups showed significant improvements in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities' osteoarthritis index disability compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: AQE had an advantage in controlling the interference with activity because of pain. AQE may be an effective tool for patients with obesity who have difficulties with active exercise due to knee osteoarthritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations167
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePM&RSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207