MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132450737 · doi:10.1109/iccsa.2011.69

PCA Based Geometric Modeling for Automatic Face Detection

2011· article· en· W2132450737 on OpenAlexaff
Padma Polash Paul, Marina L. Gavrilova

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionFace detectionFace (sociological concept)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionGeometric transformationEdge detectionObject-class detectionPrincipal component analysisFacial recognition systemPixelFeature (linguistics)Image (mathematics)Image processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, PCA based modeling of geometric structure of the face for automatic face detection is presented. The method improves the face detection rate and limits the search space. Skin Color Modeling (SCM) is one of the best face detection techniques for image and video. However, feature selection is very important for even better template matching performance in terms of detection rate and time. This paper presents an efficient feature extraction and selection method based on geometric structure of the facial image boundary and interior. To model the geometric structure of face, Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and canny edge detection are used. Fusion of PCA based geometric modeling and SCM method provides higher face detection accuracy and improves time complexity. Both models provide filtering of image in term of pixel values to get the face location that are very fast and efficient for large image databases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207