MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132457272 · doi:10.1136/gut.2007.121905

<i>MYO9B</i> polymorphisms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

2007· letter· en· W2132457272 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Javier Oliver, Juan L. Mendoza, María Gómez–García, Antonio Piñero, Carlos Taxonera, M Díaz-Rubio, Miguel Ángel López‐Nevot, Emilio G. de la Concha, Antonio Nieto, Elena Urcelay, Alfonso Martı́n, Javier Martı́n

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflammatory bowel diseaseInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An abnormal function of the intestinal barrier has been found not only in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but even in their healthy relatives, suggesting that this condition may precede disease onset by years.1 A genetic alteration in the intestinal permeability has also been proposed to exist in patients with coeliac disease. In support of this proposal, polymorphisms in the MYO9B gene (the gene for myosin IXb involved in cytoskeleton remodelling) were found to be associated with increased susceptibility to coeliac disease.2 The MYO9B gene has recently been investigated in relation to IBD and produced discordant results. No association was observed in a Norwegian population,3 but shortly afterwards an international collaboration group performed a statistically powerful study on samples collected from the UK, Netherlands, Canada and Italy in which MYO9B was found to be associated with IBD, and with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease considered separately in some populations.4 In that study, a stronger effect was seen …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207